Quick takes on 5 films

Get Hard stars Will Ferrell as James King, a Bernie Madoff-type swindling investor, headed to jail. He hires Darnell (Kevin Hart) to teach him how to survive on the inside, since he assumes Darnell will have been to jail at some point because he’s black. Sounds like a funny premise right? Unfortunately the movie is about as unfunny as a comedy can get, and even legends Ferrell and Hart can’t elicit enough laughs to save this one. You will chuckle some, but that’s the most you can hope for.
The Second Best Exotic Marigold Hotel is cute in a geriatric sort of way. I didn’t even know it was a sequel until I sat down to write this, guess the first one totally flew under the radar even for me. But it is ok, if not exactly breaking new ground. Sonny runs a popular hotel in India, whose residents are all older, rich, retired types, who live there permanently. He is now looking to open a second hotel, on the eve of his wedding, and when his investors send an inspector to see how the first hotel is run before putting money in, Sonny tries to balance it all. All of the retirees have drama surrounding their lives as well. The jokes are of the sort which my parents would laugh very hard at, but even for the “younger” under 50 crowd, there is still enough to enjoy. Has a great cast, including Dev Patel, Maggie Smith, Judi Dench, Richard Gere, and Bill Nighy.
Insurgent is the follow-up to last year’s Divergent, the movies following the popular young adult book series. As I probably said for Divergent’s review, I’m a sucker for dystopian films, but this one is a little too “young adulty” for me. There are too many “we’ll end this now, once and for all” lines for me to stomach. Shailene Woodley’s Tris is on the run and in hiding, hunted by the government for being a “divergent,” one that shows qualities in multiple emotions in a society where citizens are divided into only like-minded factions. The government wants her now to open a box left by the founders of their civilization 200 years prior, a box that only a divergent can open. Fairly straight forward if a little campy. The ending however is pretty thrilling and leaves you on a cliffhanger, waiting for the next film to see where it goes.
Good Kill is a surprisingly good “war” film while being light on the action. It stars Ethan Hawke as Tommy, a former fighter pilot who, thanks to cutbacks in the air program, is now a drone pilot. He sits in a little room in Las Vegas, shooting missiles at targets in Afghanistan, while hoping to one day get back in the cockpit. He at least soothes himself with the fact that he is taking out confirmed terrorists. However, before long the CIA starts calling the missions, and they are much more comfortable with collateral damage and firing into congested areas, a path Tommy finds increasingly harder to cope with. Hawke does an excellent job showing the conflicting emotions Tommy is dealing with, as he faces self-disgust for his actions at work, to the detriment of his life and family.

 

This film is about Adaline, a woman who through strange circumstances, stopped aging in her late 20’s. Her past 80 years is told in flashbacks, while in the present day she begins to fall in love, for the first time in decades. A problem arises though when her new love takes her to meet his parents, and she sees the father is her former love interest. He recognizes her immediately as “the one that got away”, but she diverts him by saying it was her mother. It’s an ok film, if entirely too predictable, and the ending is more sickeningly sweet than a pixy stix.

Antiquated style and ideas in The Bostonians

Not sure how Henry James’ The Bostonians made it on the list of “must read 20th century novels.” For one, it was published in 1886, but since James’ life bridged the century marker, that can be forgiven. James actually has several books on this list, some before and some during the 20th century. I hope the others are better than this one, because for two, this novel isn’t very good.

There is no doubt James is a literary master, but this book is a let down both from the plot and the questionable material. Taking place in the late 19th century, the main characters are Olive, Verena, and Basil. Olive is a staunch feminist, fighting for women’s rights. Basil is on the opposite side. He has come to the north from his home in Mississippi, basically penniless from family losses in the Civil War, and he scoffs at Olive and her friends. Verena is a gifted speaker who has taken up the plot of women, and is able to move people with her words to seemingly whatever cause she backs.

Olive latches on to Verena immediately. Verena moves in with Olive, who pushes her to do more for the cause. Though James never labels Olive a lesbian (much too taboo a point in that day), he does involve every stereotype in defining Olive’s demeanor. Verena gains fame in the local Boston community slowly over time, with Olive introducing her to society and making sure she makes the right connections. On the side, Verena meets with Basil from time to time, eventually falling for him, just as Basil has intended from the beginning. It is then that Basil comes forth with his true ideas, that more than just indifferent to women, he is of the idea that they should remain subservient to men. He wants Verena to leave Olive and her cause, and basically become his trophy wife, to only use her gift of speech to entertain him and his guests. Incredulously, Verena thinks this is a wonderful idea. Just as she is about to give her greatest speech for women, in front of the biggest New York crowd of important society, she leaves to run away with Basil.

James obviously thought little of women’s rights. This is more than just a novel but is very political, and his ideas are almost barbaric to read. Basil is a colorful, layered character, but all the women in the book are one dimensional, with no deep thoughts of their own. Yes, Olive is using Verena to her own ends (though she does obviously care for her too), but she is always very single minded. Basil just wants to marry Verena to keep her from the movement, and admits to the reader he doesn’t really care for her like she does for him. A hard book to stomach.

A challenging read in Dreiser’s An American Tragedy


I just (finally) finished Theodore Dreiser’s An American Tragedy. I have been reading less the last couple months, but even so, this was a hard book for me to read. It is a heavy book, and not just because my copy came in at 800+ pages of small print, but Dreiser’s narrative style is as thick as it gets. The characters don’t just have thoughts and then act on them, they analyze every aspect of their decisions and only came to conclusions upon a huge amount of reflection. It wasn’t unheard of to read several pages just of a single character’s throughts on one idea. I’ve read several books written in the ’20s, but this was the first time that the book “felt” like it was written in the ’20s.
Not to say it is a bad book by any stretch. The main character is Clyde Griffiths, a poor young man raised by devoutly religious parents. His parents bounce from city to city, setting up missions along the way that never get anywhere, a lifestyle Clyde abhors until he is finally old enough to get his own job as a bellhop at a local hotel. He is immediately faced with a life very different from what he is accustomed, full of rich customers to impress, loose women, and flowing alcohol. He balances home and work precariously until a car accident, in which he was a passenger, kills a young girl. Fearing jail for his proximity to the disaster, Clyde flees to a new city, to “start over.”
In his fresh start, he runs into his uncle, Samuel Griffiths. Clyde knew his father had a rich brother who continued the family’s successful business (which Clyde’s father had absolved to pursue his religious life), but he had never known him. Samuel immediately sees the family resemblance, and offers Clyde a job at the factory, starting at the bottom but with the opportunity to work his way up. Clyde is welcomed by his uncle’s family, mostly as a curiosity, but is rejected by his cousin Gilbert. Despite the Griffiths’ implied instructions to live up to the standards of the family, Clyde almost immediately reverts to his previous life. He woos a young lady in his department, Roberta, and it isn’t long before she is pregnant. This comes just about the time Clyde was ready to leave her for the desires of a high society girl, Sondra.
Clyde is now faced with a conundrum. He wants nothing more to do with Roberta, but lacks the finances to get her an abortion (remember, this is the 1920’s), and all he wants is to live like the wealthy society to which he thinks he deservedly belongs. When Roberta gives Clyde the ultimatum of marry her or she goes public, he hatches upon the plan to lure her to a lake and drown her, so he can continue his new, fabulous lifestyle. His plan has many holes, and he is arrested shortly after and accused in her murder. A short trial finds him guilty, and despite his mother arriving to campaign for him, he receives the death penalty and is executed.

That pretty much is the whole book with all major events covered. So much of this novel is thoughts, ideas, and emotions explored. The author is definitey a scholar, but it makes for a challenging read. I do like that the book is more than just a surface read. Every time Clyde strays from his family and values to pursue a life he thinks he deserves, tragedy finds him. In the end, we still aren’t sure if he truly repents or if he continues to think that Roberta’s drowning was not entirely his fault (and neither is the final preacher who could have asked the governor for lenancy after interorgating Clyde). He skates off near-misses so many times that we think at the end he may just get away with it, and that would have been a tragedy indeed. He does finally get his just desserts, though it leaves his family in distress, thinking him truly innocent because he fails to admit his guilt to them. I knew there would be books like this in my quest to read my 100, and I’m glad I stuck through to the end, but I can’t recommend it for most readers out there.

Quick takes on 5 films

All American Bully is a crappy B movie, with the look of a film that was filmed by friends over a weekend on their home cameras. In its rawest form, it is a look at bullies in high school, but it is pretty severe, and the “twist” in the end is ugly and only there for shock value. It is a sick film with no value, take my advice and don’t waste your time.
Clouds of Sils Maria however is great. As much as a film can be pretentious, this one is (there are more fade to blacks than I can count), but that doesn’t mean it isn’t good. I just said in a review earlier this year how Juliette Binoche just does boring movies, and granted, this one isn’t for everyone, but it is thought-provoking, emotional, and stirring all the same. Binoche plays Maria Enders, a famous actress from film and stage. She grew to stardome playing a young manipulative character in both the film and stage production of Maloja Snake. 20 years later, she is now approached to play the older character, Helena, in a revival. Sigrid was young and brash, but Helena is dealing with her age and society’s changing look at her because of it, much like Maria herself. There are a million little nuances floated in this movie, such as the relationship between Sigrid and Helena mirroring Maria and her assistant (played by Kristen Stewart), as well as Maria and the “new” Sigrid (Chloe Grace-Moretz). In the movie, Maria makes a firm point of showing she is a “serious” actress and looks down on “hollywood” films as beneath her, especially at this point in her career, so perhaps it is a peek at Binoche’s views as well, who seems to do 10 small independent films for every big-budget she is involved in. Sils Maria is extremely well acted and though it forgives Maria her faults while inspecting everyone else’s, it is still a pleasant film.
Liam Neeson’s hard-edged good guy (or bad guy with good intentions, as in this movie) is starting to get a little old. He plays some version or another of the same character in all of these movies, to the point that you wonder if you’ve seen this one before. In Run All Night, he plays a former enforcer that got out of the game long ago, but is dragged back in when his son is targeted by his former employers. Trying to protect his son, he handles all the bad guys that come their way. Heavy on the action, light on the plot, there is nothing very memorable about this one, but it can be a decent deversion for action movie diehards. Of course the ending is thoroughly predictable, but that never stopped a good action movie anyway.
While last year’s Unbroken got a lot of press (though it was not as good as the hype), ’71 is Jack O’Connell’s “other” military-esque movie that came out last year, and it is the one you should have seen instead. In it, Jack plays a young British soldier trying to keep the peace against the IRA seperatists in unstable Belfast, Ireland, in 1971. He is seperated from his troop during a gun raid, and has to spend the night on the run from multiple groups that want to either kill him outright, or capture him as leverage. He finds friends in unlikely places, and ultimately sees that the sides of the conflict are not as clearly drawn as he first thought. O’Connell is great in it; the movie is tense, a great action film, but with excellent acting as well.

 

I had to think twice about Danny Collins, but ultimately decided from the synopsis that I should give it a go. I’m not an Al Pacino fan, generally I think he is about as overrated as they come. Not a bad actor by any stretch, actually very good to brilliant in many films, but his fellow actors fawn over him like the second coming. Anyway, that initially kept me from this film, but I’m glad I went for it. He plays Danny Collins, a huge mega-rich rock star now advancing to his older years, stuck playing hit songs from his youth to an increasingly older audience. The movie prelude shows him as a young man just getting into the music business, and during an interview, the interviewer says he knows he will blow up and be huge, and that his writing and style reminds him of John Lennon. Little did Danny know, but Lennon heard about the interview and wrote him a letter, which Danny never got until decades later. Upon finally seeing it, he decides to take his life in a new direction. He dumps his 30 something year old girlfriend, gives up cocain, and drives to Jersey to reconnect with his son, who he has not had any interaction with for all of his life. There are many things going on with his son’s life, the least of which is his pent-up anger at the father he never knew. The film does try awfully hard to get you to the edge of emotion, with varying levels of success, but it is a great film about redemption, and the promise that it is never too late.

Quick takes on 5 films

Focus is a fairly good movie, but what makes it entertaining ends up reducing its “re-watchability” down to zero. Will Smith plays a high rolling con man, who uses everyone around him to meet his goals of conning thousands (and millions) out of targets. So the big surprises when the cons go down are certainly entertaining, but only the first time. In fact, it happens a few too many times in the movie, so that by the end, you are on your guard and waiting for the big reveal. This lowers the excitement that should be there at the end of the film, but it is still a good ride.

 

Kingsman was a much more entertaining film than I thought it was going to be. I couldn’t tell from the previews if this movie was supposed to be a serious spy movie, or more of a comedy spoof. Well it’s not a spoof, but it does have some out-of-left-field weirdness, which thankfully doesn’t detract from an otherwise good, action film. It follows the Kingsmen, a super secret spy organization in the UK, where members are given Arthurian code names (Lancelot, Gallihad, etc.). Mostly, it follows young Exie, a young man whose father was a member and who is now recruited to join the group too, by the affable Colin Firth. The ultra villain is played by Samuel L Jackson, who despite ambitions against the world, he hates and cowers from violence and bloodshed. This movie has all the secrets and double-crosses of a good Bond film, and is fun (with laughs thrown in) from the get-go.
Slow West is a pretty good “old style” western, with the feel of the oldies and goodies. The two leads are the great Michael Fassbender and the equally compelling up-and-comer Kodi Smit-McPhee. Smit-McPhee plays Jay, a young Scottish boy who has come to the western USA to find his love, who is on the run for murder, which Jay insists was not her fault. He is aided in his search by the hard-living Silas, played by Fassbender. On the way, they are hounded by a group of bounty hunters, who would love to get to the girl first, for her reward “dead or alive”, or “dead or dead” as Silas points out. Produced by A24 Films (in my opinion one of the great independent studios that keeps putting out hits), it is a fairly quiet, slow-paced movie with moments of stark, quick action. A very gripping film, it catches you early on and keeps you hanging on every moment until the surprising ending.
It is really too bad Jupiter Ascending is a sub-par movie. Made by the folks behind the Matrix movies, it features Channing Tatum and Mila Kunis in an intergalactic cat-and-mouse family conflict. Mila plays Jupiter, a girl who finds out not only are there alien species out there, but she is royalty among them. The film is visually stunning, which is saying something these days when just about every sci-fi film packs the CGI in to a ridiculous level. This movie is eye-popping in its realism and brilliance, but the story, and especially the dialogue, is sometimes downright terrible, even cringe-worthy. For true science fiction buffs, it is worth seeing for the visual spectacles alone, but you might as well watch it the volume down. You might even enjoy it more that way.

 

To put it bluntly, Woman in Gold is a dull film. It stars Helen Mirren as Maria Altmann, and is based on the true story of her fight to retreive her family’s artwork from a museum in Austria, which was stolen by the nazi’s when she was a girl. She is aided by lawyer Randy (Ryan Reynolds). The two are believable on camera, but if it sounds boring, that’s because it is. I’ve said before I’m a history buff, and I generally like these kinds of movies, but as much as I like to see past injustices righted, there’s not much to get excited about this film. I like a good dialogue drama as much as anyone, but I just sort of crawled to the end on this one. Maybe I learned a thing or two though.

Quick takes on 5 films

The Duff is a cute teenage film. Duff stands for Designated Ugly Fat Friend, and when Bianca learns she is the Duff for her hot friends, she sets out to make changes to her life, in order to get the attention of her crush Toby. She enlists help from her neighbor Wesley, with whom she was good friends as kids, but has grown apart from as he became Mr. Popular as they got older. I don’t think it will attain cult classic status like some of the coming-of-age films that were around in my younger years, or maybe I’m just biased, but it is funny throughout and has a heartfelt, if anticipated, ending. It does a good job of poking fun at today’s youth in the way Clueless did for my generation.
Chappie is the third film from Neill Blomkamp, and unfortunately they keep getting worse after his first, District 9, which I loved. Chappie tells the tale of a robot gaining consciousness in a Short Circuit sort of story, if you were to take Johnny 5 and put him in the hood. Chappie is raised by a couple thugs, who mistreat him horribly and take him on their crime spree. When the only saving grace of the film is the emotion you feel when Chappie is getting abused, you know it isn’t good. They also tried far too hard to grab your attention during action scenes, and the story is about as thin as it gets. Even sci-fi lovers like myself will find little to enjoy here.
Project Almanac is about the same as the above review. A very good premise, it starts when a group of teenage friends are watching old home videos and see one of themselves, as a current 17 year old, reflected in the mirror of their own 7th birthday party. Knowing they somehow build a time machine, they get to it. The movie is about the consequences of making little changes in the past and how that affects the future. Unfortunately it is very disjointed and poorly explained, and to make matters worse, it uses the “found footage” routine to try to keep it feeling fresh, which lets face it, it doesn’t feel fresh anymore. It is really wasted too, there are some original ideas, but they are never explored properly and the whole movie deevolves to teenagers yelling “oh shit!” and running around frantically.
Should have listened to all the reviews and avoided this one. Serena stars the heralded duo of Bradley Cooper and Jennifer Lawrence, so it has to be good, right? Unfortunately their talents are wasted on this one. Bradley plays George, owner of a lumber company trying to work and save to grow his business, doing underhand dealings with the local politicians to keep his struggling business afloat. He meets and falls in love with Jennifer’s Serena, a strong-willed businesswoman whose family also came from the timber business. Somewhere along the lines, a movie is supposed to take place, but I couldn’t find it. Plot elements are introduced and go nowhere, including one device that is used twice! (Friend starts to turn in George, and he is “dealt with.”) Very quickly Serena goes from a shrewd, smart woman to bat-shit crazy, with the transformation so fast you wonder if you missed something. Just stay away.

 

I don’t know what to make of Welcome to Me. It stars Kristen Wiig in yet another dramatic role, but this one is more Hateship Loveship (bad) than Skeleton Twins (good). She plays Alice, an adult who has been hurt much of her life, a bad situation made worse because she has decided to stop taking meds for her Borderline Personality Disorder. She wins a huge lottery of $80+ million, and decides to sink it into a talk show about her life. Most of the movie is the sort of cringe worthy, awkward humor that Wiig is known for, and she is good as always, but because of her character’s disorder you don’t know whether to laugh or just squirm uncomfortably. Wiig seems to like these roles lately and is really pumping them out the last couple years, but this one is a bit of a miss.

Ethan Hunt brings the gang back to hunt a Rogue Nation

The ageless Tom Cruise still knows how to make an action film. Rogue Nation is the fifth installment of the Mission Impossible franchise, and it builds on the success of 2011’s (has it been that long?) Ghost Protocol. Ethan Hunt and his team have been shut down by Congress, who no longer approves of a group that offers no oversight and seemingly do missions on their own with no approval or outside direction, even if said missions are for the greater good of the ol’ US of A. The shutdown comes at a tricky time for Ethan, who is on the cusp of outting the Syndicate, a sort of anti-IMF secret organization that has been carrying out terrorist activities around the globe. Ethan decides to go underground and continue his search, trying to catch up to the Syndicate while also hiding from the CIA, as he is now a wanted man.

It’s a good old spy film that is heavy on the action. You have to be original to keep a car chase film entertaining, and this team brings the goods. It also keeps you thinking, there is a certain amount of wondering who is good and who is bad, with some characters having multple motives they are juggling. Cruise is backed by a great cast, brought over from the last couple films. Lots of tension and lots of gun fights make for another big film! Judging by its opening weekend, I’m sure we’ll get another one too!

Quick takes on 5 films

Cake is exactly what I heard it to be. Starring Jennifer Aniston as a woman suffering from a pretty severe case of chronic pain, it features tremendous acting by her (maybe her best?) in a pretty lukewarm plot. We learn as the movie goes along that her pain is the result of a bad car accident, leaving her with scars all over her body and her young son dead. The emotional trauma from it has ruined her marriage and turned her into a pretty sour person. She spends the movie obsessing over another girl in her support group, who had just killed herself, while at the same time starting to let others in to her life again. Aniston is terrific, showing she can do much more than usual 2-dimensional characters she often portrays, but the movie is just ok. Worthy of a single viewing for Aniston alone.

Black Sea is a pretty awesome movie and a good change of pace for what I’ve been watching lately. It is a deep sea thriller, staring Jude Law as a salvage expert looking for old wrecks. He is approached about finding and recovering an old Nazi Germany U-boat, suposedly full of gold. Most of the film takes place in an old sub they were able to procure for the hunt, with rising tensions between the mix of British and Russian crew. When Law’s character announces everyone will be getting an equal share of the loot, one crewman prophetically says there will be problems when the crew realizes each person’s share gets bigger if a person or two dies along the way. Great, tense film with good surprises along the way, and a satifsfying, if somewhat predictable ending. A good nail-biter if you are in the mood or that!

Next up was a good family Disney film, McFarland USA. It showcases Kevin Costner in what he does best, a good sports film. This one is based on a true story, with Costner as Jim White, a teacher and coach in a small town in rural Texas. The population is nearly 100% hispanic, and White must adapt to a culture where his students do more than just go to school, with many of them working long hours before and after class to support their families. He starts a cross country team when he sees potential in a few students, and takes them from humble beginnings to success. A bit hokey at times, but a heart-warming film.

I really wanted to catch Mr Turner last year during my theater craze, but it saw very limited release in my area and I missed it. It is a historical semi-biography, based on the later life of 19th century English painter J.M.W. Turner, portrayed here by Timothy Spall. It is a fairly quiet film, no big plot twists or revelations, but it is extremely well done and Spall is incredible. He is an artist who is celebrated at the beginning, but after his father dies (which greatly affects his mood henceforth), he tries new techniques which diminish his reputation. He is very much a loner and brushes others off wherever he goes, and is consumed with art, going so far as to scoff at other painters if he feels their work is subpar. I think this is a film movie-lovers can adore, but I know many (such as my wife) would stop after 20 minutes, evidenced by 98% critic score on Rotten Tomatoes but only 57% by viewers.

Taken 3 continues Liam Neeson’s franchise as a badass taker-down of bad guys. However it does lack the surprises of the first film, and even had a less tense feel than the second. As long as they keep making money, I’m sure they’ll keep making them. This time Mills’ ex-wife has been killed, and he has been set up for the murder. The plot tries to get you to follow it down a couple “twists” that you see coming from the first 5 minutes, but the action sequences are still ok at least. I think even die-hard action film fans will find little to get too excited about in this one though.

Paul Rudd helps Ant-Man continue Marvel’s tradition

Last year no one expected Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy to do much, and it turned into another blockbuster. Not sure if Ant-Man will make a ton of money, but it sort of followed the same path. It is a movie that on the surface doesn’t seem to fit in with Marvel’s Thor/Iron Man/Captain America themes, but it delivers well and is a ton of fun to watch.

Paul Rudd plays Scott Lang, who is recruited by Michael Douglas’s Hank Pym, the original Ant-Man in comic lore. The plot is a bit convoluted and overall feels a little disjointed at times, but Rudd keeps it light and he is his usual funny, charming self. His delivery is on target throughout the film, and even heavy moments keep from feeling too dark. The middle of the film felt a little slow, but the ending definitely made up for it, with great action scenes. It was also a pleasant change of pace. When every Marvel movie seems to be saving the world, in Ant-Man the scale is much smaller.

This is a very enjoyable movie. It feels different yet similar to the Marvel movies that came before, and fits in nicely. Disney/Marvel keep doing a good job of making fun movies that satisfy casual and hardcore fans alike.

Quick takes on 5 films

Not quite sure how I feel about this movie. It is heartbreakingly sad, the story of an intelligent women losing her mind to early onset Altzheimer’s. Granted, Julianne Moore as Alice is incredible. She deals with her quickly failing cognitive abilities with as much grace as possible, but all the film does is make you feel sorry for her. Her family stays by her side even when she no longer knows who they are. Little things are perhaps the saddest, like they day she can’t remember how to tie her shoes properly, or when she goes to the bathroom in her clothes because she can’t remember where the bathroom is. In the end of course, there is no swooping savior or something that makes it all right, she just fades away. As an insight for someone like myself who has never been touched by this disease, it is a fascinating picture, just not sure how good of a movie it actually is.

Into the Woods got a lot of praise when it came out end of last year. I almost saw it in theaters during my run but didn’t make it. Glad I didn’t. Not sure what the hype was about. Pretty bland movie, geared towards kids (I think?) but fairly dark at the end when people start dying in droves. Big all-star cast hides a disappointing plot, and though I’m a sucker for musicals, I could have done without the plethora of aimless songs. The movie is a re-telling of a few classic stories interwoven together, including Rapuznel, Cinderella, Jack and Giant Bean Stalk, and Red Riding Hood. Their individual tales colide with weird consequences. Overall, this is one of those that I’m sure the stage production is better than the film.

Maps to the Stars is just a strange film. It paints Hollywood society as a dark culture, with everyone sleeping with everyone to get to the top, everyone popping pills, everyone holding dark secrets, and just about everyone has some weird psychotic episode at one point or another. It is extremely well acted, so movie lovers may want to see it for the acting alone, but the plot is a bit convoluted. Much of the film is based on a twist that is revealed about halfway through, so it is hard to say anything without giving it all away, but the ending is not quite what you expect and I think the movie tries too hard to elicit a gasp from the audience.

Paddington is a cute kid’s film, based on the old children’s books. It doesn’t have the same kind of appeal to adults; I enjoyed it mostly, because it felt like the type of kids movies that were around when I was a kid myself, almost like going back in time, but perhaps because of that it doesn’t have the same adult reach that, say, the latest Pixar movies have. But it is adorable. The story is of Paddington the bear, who has lost his family and is now trying to find a new home in the busy streets of London. The family that takes him in takes time to warm up to him, and the film is mostly the antics they go through together. Cute, but not much replay value if you are over the age of 10.

I honestly don’t know why critics were so hard on The Wedding Ringer. It doesn’t pretend to be a great cinematic experience, you won’t find expert acting or story, but it is a genuinely hilarious film. Doug is a guy with no friends, so when he is getting married to gorgeous Gretchen, he needs to quickly find not only a best man, but a whole suite of groomsmen to match his popular bride’s ladies. He turns to Best Man Inc, a company that hires out wedding parties, with Jimmy to be his best man. The spend the week getting to know each other, so that Jimmy can put together the perfect fake best man, but events take them in a new direction. The jokes come from the banter between leads Josh Gad and Kevin Hart. Not as crude as some of Hart’s other material, but still edgy and loud-out-loud good at times. If you are a critic, don’t bother, there is no deep meaning here, but for everyone else, you will laugh.