Love and loss for Him and Her in Eleanor Rigby
I wanted to see this film as soon as I heard about it last year, but the “full” versions never made it to a theater near me. An ambitious project, The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby is the same story told from two different perspectives.
Originally conceived as two films, The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Him and : Her each tells the story of a hurt marriage from the husband’s and wife’s viewpoints, husband Conor, played by James McAvoy and wife Eleanor, played by Jessica Chastain. Depending on the order in which you watch the films, you are left with a very different lasting perspective.
I watched Him first, which starts with Eleanor confronting Conor and saying she needs a break. She suddenly leaves, and Conor is left wondering what happened or what he did wrong. He spends the film hunting her down and trying to reconcile. The reason for her departure is later explained. I then watched Her, which starts just after the breakup, with Eleanor attempting suicide (something you were never aware of during Him). Her demons are slowly brought to the surface throughout the film.
Since Him follows the guy, it is told in a “guy’s” sort of way. It is very linear with a straight forward plot. Her is more wandering and emotional, telling more backstory along the way as Eleanor reminisces about the past. Both together tell the complete story of a marriage on the rocks, and the viewer can feel (especially in Her) the anguish the couple is going through.
Theaters were reluctant to release 2 fully separate films at the same time, so an edited version that combined the two was released titled The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Them. I did not see this one, but having seen Him and Her, I think that is definitely the way to see the full idea. I can’t see how they would edit 3+ hours down to just 2, plus Him and Her are worth watching just for the differing perspectives. Shared scenes are subtly different in each film, with the logic being Conor and Eleanor each remember events in different ways. A very heart wrenching film with brilliant acting.
Crime thriller in January and family laughs in Alexander
The Two Faces of January is a quiet, slowly tense thriller that hearkens back to crime films of the 50’s and 60’s, in that it has a very retro-like feel and even plot. Two leads, Viggo Mortensen and Kirsten Dunst, have made their share of blockbusters but have lately been seen more in small independent films, while the third, Oscar Isaac, has made a career of small films and is just getting ready to heady to mainstream with the upcoming Star Wars and X-Men films.
Chester (Mortensen) and Colette (Dunst) are touring Europe when they bump into Rydal (Isaac), an American moonlighting as a tour guide while he decides what he wants to do with his life. Unbeknownst at first, Chester is in hiding for having swindled a bunch of investors back in the states. When a PI catches up to him, Chester kills him and enlists Rydal’s help to flee. Rydal is instantly attracted to Colette, and as the film progresses, we see how far Chester is willing to go to protect his own and keep on the run.
The film has a fair number of plot twists that keep you on your toes, events that you just don’t see coming, but for me it had the feel of great actors concealing a very average movie. It tries to set Rydal up as an unwilling accomplice, but he goes too far to help Chester that it is hard to sympathize much. A short film at just 96 or so minutes, so worth a single viewing if you have an afternoon free.
I skipped on this film last year during my movie adventure (I skipped a lot of the kid-oriented films) so finally getting around to it. The book was one of my favorites as a little kid, and the movie does it justice. You’ve probably heard the premise from all the previews last year. Alexander lives his life with perpetual bad luck, until the day of his 12th birthday when inexplicably, his bad luck transfers to the others in his family. The film is their antics throughout the day as increasingly worse things continue to happen. Alexander can just sit back in wonder as his day goes well, while everyone else has the worst day of their lives. Even when they feel like they’ve turned the corner and it starts to look like it may get better, bad things just keep happening to the poor family.
It’s good family entertainment. I think kids will laugh the hardest, but there are still grins and chuckles for adults too.
Hector also finds himself in his Search for Happiness
I’m an admitted sap for these kinds of films, even when hardcore critics don’t like them. And despite its rough reviews, I enjoyed Hector and the Search for Happiness.
Hector (Simon Pegg), is a psychiatrist who has lost his sense of happiness in life. He has an adoring girlfriend Clara (Rosamund Pike, known for last year’s Gone Girl) and a successful career, but one day he realizes he has lost happiness, if he ever had it at all, and is just going through the motions of life. He decides to set out on a solo trek around the world to find the meaning of happiness. He keeps his notes in a journal, and each entry as he makes it is scribbled across the screen in a charming quirky manner. Some are funny, but most are thought provoking or poignant. He has many adventures across the globe, before coming to know true happiness is in himself, and is just waiting there for him to reach out and grab it.
I’m a sucker for these “finding yourself” kind of films. I thoroughly enjoyed this one. It is funny and Simon Pegg is his affable self, but he does manage to stretch his character and show a side we don’t often see in his other comedic roles. It’s just a good old feel good kind of movie.
Thought-provoking sci-fi jumps through time in Predestination
This movie will leave you thinking, and has the potential to blow your mind in a Matrix-like way. In an alternate reality where time travel was invented in the early 80’s, Predestination stars Ethan Hawke as a time-jumping cop. The film is based on a short story by Robert A Heinlein, an author I read much of when I was first getting in to sci-fi, as many did.
The protagonist’s group jumps to places in the past and future to stop major crimes from taking place. The film is mostly about his hunting of a serial bomber nicknamed the Fizzle Bomber. Unfortunately the bomber is aware of the time cops in some way, because he keeps changing the day he sets off his big blast that kills thousands, thus not giving the cops a consistent specific day or time to stop him, only knowing it will happen sometime in March 1975. Ethan goes back to play as a bartender in 1970 on a lead. One night, in walks Jane, who tells him a fantastical tale.
I really can’t give much more than that without giving away crucial story elements, and I do like to keep my movie reviews spoiler-free. This film has elements of science-fiction obviously, but also is at its heart a mystery. You don’t know who is who or who is on who’s side, and just when you think you have started to figure it out, the movie flips it on you in the latter third. Unfortunately it lets loose a big surprise a little early in my opinion, you guess the final climax before it actually happens. That being said, it is one of most thought-provoking films I’ve seen in a bit, and puts forth the question if we have control of our lives, or if everything is preordained.
Characters fail to come to life in The French Lieutenant’s Woman
On my quest to read through this list of “100 Great Novels” I knew I’d find at least a few I didn’t much care for. I finally found one at # 8, The French Lieutenant’s Woman by John Fowles. It’s not a terrible novel and is obviously well thought of, but it isn’t my cup of tea.
As a reader, I like to immerse myself in the book I’m reading. I like to think that what I’m reading can exist in another world, that I see the characters as real beings. Even the most outlandish sci-fi can come to life in my mind and be real when I turn the pages. In Woman however, we are told early on by the writer (in first person) that it is a work of fiction and he is but telling a tale. Fowles even goes so far as to change his story here and there, where he will write a chapter or two, and then in Clue-like fashion say, “It may have happened like that, or it may have happened like this.” In this way, it is hard to truly care for characters that you can’t even envision as real. Furthermore, he treats this novel almost as a conversation he is having with the reader, or a point of debate (obviously a one sided debate as you cannot discuss with him, just hear his point of view).
The plot follows Charles, a mid-19th century entitled rich man in Victorian England society. He is wealthy to a point, but is in line to inherit much more when his heir-less rich uncle will die. Charles is engaged to Ernestina, daughter of a “new money” family who’s merchant father is looking to raise her to a higher society. They are wintering in the small town of Lyme, where Charles comes across the “French Lieutenant’s Woman,” Sarah. Sarah is a depressed for having been spurned by a marooned French soldier who she says she deeply loved. Charles is immediately moved and over the course of the novel, grows to have feelings for Sarah. After a book full of hand wringing and deep introspection, during which his uncle marries (thus leaving Charles out of his inheritance), and some minor revelations about Sarah, Charles finally decides to leave his betrothed. By this time Sarah has left too. When he finally finds her a couple years later, she seems to only wish to enjoy her misery.
This book is at times esoteric, with Fowles becoming very philosophical. He will spend whole sections of chapters discussing the meaning of thoughts and ideas, some that seem to only superficially pertain to the story at hand. He is obviously well read and a deep thinker, and while I do like a book that makes me think, sometimes I just want to be engaged in a good plot.
George comes to terms with himself and society in Babbitt
A couple Sci-Fi romances in The One I Love and For Your Eyes
The One I Love is a cute little romantic movie with a science-fiction twist. Ethan (Mark Duplass) and Sophie (Elisabeth Moss) are a married couple trying to work through his recent infidelity. Their therapist sends them to a picturesque weekend getaway to try to renew their love. Upon arriving, they discover something fantastical about their retreat: in the adjoining guest house, they are able to see a more perfect version of their spouse. When Ethan walks in, he finds another Sophie, one who is attentive and thoughtful and dresses herself up. When Sophie enters, the new Ethan inside is spontaneous, caring, and willing to discuss his emotions rather than walling himself off. Both are obviously weirded out at first, but Sophie is quickly attracted to the new Ethan and implores her husband to enjoy this new change, to help reconnect them to each other. Ethan is analytical and since he can’t explain what is going on, he refuses to spend much time in the guest house, while Sophie spends more and more time there.
This is a pretty heart warming tale, and takes a close look at how easy it is for a couples’ relationship to become stale and monotonous when you aren’t working at it. At one point, Ethan is upset and asks Sophie if she thinks the new Ethan is a better version of him, and Sophie responds with something like “He’s not a better version of you, he is you, or the you you used to be.” The ending of the film, and identity of the “guests,” isn’t quite what I was hoping for, but it is still a poignant movie.
In Your Eyes is another odd little romance. This one is written by Joss Whedon, of former Buffy and more recent Avengers fame. It is obviously a bit of a departure for him, but a well done one. This one never hit theaters, it was distributed online last year.
Dylan (Michael Stahl-David) and Rebecca (Zoe Kazan) share a telepathic link. They’ve had it their whole lives, but never consciously knew about it until one day they can start to hear each other’s voices in their heads. Dylan is an ex-con, from running with the wrong crowd, and Rebecca is married to a caring, but sometimes cold and detached husband. The film follows them as they get to know each other. Eventually they begin to fall for each other. They can’t hear thoughts, only spoken word, so some parts are comical as others around them think they are each talking to themselves. It takes a serious turn though when Rebecca’s husband has her institutionalized, and Dylan breaks his parole by leaving the state and trying to rescue her.
Kazan is cute as a button as she has been in the last few films I’ve seen, but that doesn’t save a fairly lackluster movie. It has a neat paranormal concept, but in the end feels like a gushy romance novel turned into film.
The Great Game shown in a close view in Kipling’s Kim
Rudyard Kipling’s Kim was published in 1901, and is titled for the main character. Kim is a young man in India, about 13 or so. His parents were Irish, but both died when he was very young, so he has raised himself on the streets and is so ingrained in the local customs that he is able to blend in seamlessly.
The book opens with him helping a Tibetan lama, or holy man. Kim begs for food for him and immediately is attracted to his cause. The lama is on a holy quest to find a sacred river with healing properties. Kim decides to join along, and is promptly given the title of chela, or disciple. On their way out of town, they are aided by Kim’s friend Mahbub Ali, a successful horse-breeder and trader. When Mahbub’s camp is raided by unknown spies, Mahbub sends Kim off with a note, a coded message, to deliver a couple towns over. Kim does so, and eavesdrops afterwards to realize the note was a warning of an impending troop deployment in the ongoing conflict between British and Russian forces, who have been opposed for decades over the land in Afghanistan and India.
Shortly after leaving the village, the duo comes upon a British regiment. Once Kim’s ancestry becomes known, they take him under their wing to raise him as a Sahib (Arabic for holder or master, but in this book really means any Euro- or Russian- caucasian). The lama is amazed Kim is actually British, but now that he knows he wants him to be educated as such, agreeing to pay the fee for a good school for Sahib children. Kim is reluctant at first, not wanting to be taught English math and writing, skills he sees as useless, but he is approached by Mahbub again, and initiated into “The Great Game.” Because Kim is fluent in the local customs across India, but has a British background, he is going to be taught how to be a spy for the British government, which Mahbub has been all along.
For the next 3 years, Kim is educated in English skills in school, but spends his holidays learning from Lurgan Sahib, a master spy. Here he trains his memory, and how to disguise his look and speech to blend in no matter what region he is in, and from fellow spy Hurree Babu, about medicines. Finally he sets off from school and rejoins the lama on his quest, who is unaware of Kim’s new career. Several rapid adventures happen in succession, culminating when the pair inadvertently come across a couple Russian spies for the other side, who Babu has been guiding while waiting for the right moment to steal their papers. A conflict sets off, which leaves the lama sick in spirit (he gave in to anger, putting him “off his path,”), and the Russians’ papers in Kim’s hands. He slowly treks the ailing lama south, growing physically weaker himself with fatigue and illness, until they finally collapse.
When he comes to a few days later, he finds Babu has caught up to him. Babu looks through the papers and finds they are very important, detailing Russian spies and movements, and future plans. He congratulates Kim on his work and agrees to meet him when he returns to town. Kim also finds the lama is restored, he has found his spiritual awakening, his “river” that he has been seeking this whole time, and promises to now impart his wisdom to Kim. The novel ends not knowing what Kim will do, if he will go to town to immerse himself as a full time spy, if he will follow the lama on a spiritual quest, or if he will continue to try to do both.
This was a fascinating book to read. It is extremely detailed, as the reader I was fully immersed in the Indian customs, lifestyles, and view of life. Kipling is so matter-of-fact about things that are so foreign to me as an American, that you really feel at ease in the culture. The caste system is on full display, showing Kim’s reactions to different people solely based on where they are from. The entire way of life is different, from how certain groups are treated, to how beggars are tolerated, to their speech, which is full of metaphors and colorful descriptions. It is a very rich and fulfilling read. While Kipling’s The Jungle Book will forever be what he is most known for, Kim is an engrossing and mesmerizing tale.
Never find yourself in front of a walrus’s Tusk
Should have just listened to the reviews and avoided this one. Tusk is the newest from Kevin Smith, and finds him making a departure from his usual teen-focused poop jokes. It is a horror film, about a juvenile radio jock going to Canada to make a podcast about a person there. He comes across an old man with stories to tell, but ends up becoming said man’s experiment. The old man starts slowly turning the radio dj into a walrus, with skin grafts and whatnot, while he is being sought by friends back home.
A terrible movie, with terrible dialogue and a thin, terrible script. The acting is just as rough. The only highlight is in the last third when inexplicably, Johnny Depp shows up. How this movie got made is beyond me. Don’t waste your time.











