Quick takes on 5 films

death of dick longNot quite sure what to make of The Death of Dick Long. The filmmakers themselves didn’t know if it should be a comedy or a dark drama, and so it sort of fails at being both. The eponymous Dick and his two buddies Zeke and Earl are a trio of redneck friends in a garage band. After a night of drinking, drugs, and debauchery, we see Zeke and Earl dumping their buddy, who is bleeding profusely, in front of the hospital and then making a run for it. Dick does (obviously) end up dying, but the answer to what brought them to that point isn’t immediately clear. The two surviving friends do a really lousy job of covering their tracks, even to the point that the inept local police officers are still able to put two and two together (finally). The funny moments aren’t funny enough, and the dramatic moments aren’t believable enough, for this film to ever get anywhere worth really enjoying. I rather liked director Daniel Scheinert’s previous film, Swiss Army Man, and this one has a bit of that same zany, off-beat comedy, but it’s just not very good. ★½

j and s rebootI expected to not enjoy Jay and Silent Bob Reboot. Don’t get me wrong, growing up in the 90’s I loved Clerks, Mallrats, Chasing Amy, and Dogma as much as anyone, but watching those films now, the humor doesn’t really hold up. But you know, the newest film isn’t half bad, if you are a fan that is. Watching it was like slipping on an old hat; worn, tired, but comfortable. Even the actors themselves joke that this movie is a reboot of Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back from nearly 20 years ago. The marijuana-loving duo are headed to California to stop a reboot of that film from 2001 being made again, and have adventures along the way, with all of Kevin Smith’s cast of regulars back for more shenanigans. The film is chuck full of familiar and new faces, all poking fun at themselves and the filmmakers, and the viewer really feels like they are in on the jokes too. Some of the best jokes are saved for some of Kevin’s failed movies, so it’s nice that he can be as self deprecating as he is. If you aren’t a Kevin Smith fan, you’ll hate this movie, but if you are, give it a chance, because you’ll probably laugh more than you’ll expect to. It’s no great “cinema,” but it doesn’t try to be, and sometimes that’s ok. ★★★

tm dark fateI also enjoyed Terminator: Dark Fate a whole heck of a lot more than anticipated. Heralded as the return of director James Cameron, who did the first two films so many years ago, this one is a direct sequel to Terminator 2, and ignores the 3 movies that came after that one. Maybe those films lowered my expectations, but this one was great. After a short intro that shows a Terminator was indeed able to kill John Connor shortly after the events of T2, we fast forward to present day and the arrival of two newcomers to our time from the future. One is the newest killing machine, Rev-9 (Gabriel Luna), and the other is a cybernetically enhanced human named Grace (Mackenzie Davis in a badass role). Even though Sarah and John Connor halted the start of Skynet, the inevitable happened and robots (AI) still started a war with humans. In the new future, with John Connor dead, the new hero is the unborn child of a woman named Dani, so Rev-9, with some seriously cool new tricks, has been sent back to kill her and Grace has been sent back to protect. Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton, reprising her role) also shows up to do her part. The film sounds like a reboot of its own, but it isn’t. It has a similar premise but feels fresh, and it is a wild ride from the get-go. ★★★½

big time adolBig Time Adolescence is much better than anticipated too. It co-stars two guys who we’ve seen before, but I believe this may be their first leading roles. Mo (Griffin Gluck) is a 16-year-old boy who seems to have a good head on his shoulders, except for the fact he hangs out with much older guys, who aren’t exactly role models. The main one of this group is Zeke (SNL’s Pete Davidson), a stoner ex-boyfriend of Mo’s sister. Zeke is in his early 20’s and is just floating through life. Mo’s parents urge him to hang out with people his own age, but Mo really looks up to Zeke, and that influence begins to show. First Zeke starts getting alcohol and drugs for a few people in school, but eventually builds to being the dealer for the entire school. Zeke’s relationship advice doesn’t exactly pan out well for Mo either. I love me a good coming-of-age film, and this one mostly hits in all the right places, even if it is a bit predictable as most in this genre are. Gluck is really good as Mo, a young man who, like most 16 year olds, just wants to be accepted, and Davidson is passable as Zeke. Davidson has the kind of personality that makes him feel endearing to viewers, which helps in a role like this, even if his acting chops aren’t quite there yet. The comparisons to Adam Sandler are inevitable, and like in Sandler’s early films, Davidson’s charisma creates entertainment, allowing the viewer to look past some shortcomings. Sandler was able to grow and show some more nuanced performances later on, and we’ll see if Davidson can do the same. Still, I liked the movie. ★★★½

motherless brooklynMotherless Brooklyn is an old-school film noir with a sterling cast who seem perfect for their roles. It has the right music and feel and even the deadpan voiceover narration; except for some curse words, if it were in black and white, it could have come out in the 50’s and you’d never know it. It is about a private investigator, Lionel, who has tourette’s (unnamed for this era, but that’s what it is), but his ticks are forgiven by his office’s head, Frank, because Lionel can remember anything and everything he sees and hears. What he hears one day is a contentious discussion between Frank and some unknown visitors, and it leads to Frank being shot and killed. Lionel immerses himself in finding the culprits, but the rabbit hole takes him to corrupt politicians, seedy Harlem jazz nightclubs, and a fight over redevelopment of lower-middle-class housing which the city wants to clear out for new highways. It is a very good film, maybe not great but close, with some remarkable acting jobs by Edward Norton in the lead, as well as Bruce Willis, Alec Baldwin, Willem Dafoe, Gugu Mbatha-Raw, Cherry Jones, and Michael K Williams, as well as a host of other recognizable faces. The good moments are really good, spellbinding in fact, but there are slow stretches which, while important to the mystery Lionel is trying to unravel, do seem to drag. ★★★

Quick takes on 5 foreign films

a warKrigen (A War) comes out of Denmark, from director Tobias Lindholm. It stars Pilou Asbaek (Euron Greyjoy of Game of Thrones fame) as Claus, a commander of a group of soldiers hunting Taliban in Afghanistan. His troop loses one man when he steps on an IED, and it has shaken unit’s core. Shortly after, they are pinned down in a compound while on a patrol, taking heavy fire, when another member is critically wounded. The medevac can’t come in, so Claus orders an airstrike of the vicinity where he believes the enemy fire is coming from. It works, and the wounded soldier is rescued out, saving his life. Unfortunately for Claus, there were woman and children in that compound, and he is brought up on charges that he called the attack without having confirmation of an enemy presence there. The final section of the film shifts from the war zone to the court room. The movie is critically acclaimed, but I wasn’t moved. For one, I don’t think Asbaek is that great of an actor (wasn’t in Game of Thrones, and this film hasn’t changed my mind). Secondly, while Claus was obviously in a no-win situation, it’s still awfully egotistical to think the life of one soldier is more important than a house full of innocents. Very average film for me. ★★½

theebTheeb is much better. A joint production from a few countries including Jordan, UAE, and the UK, and from director Naji Abu Nowar, it takes place in the desert during World War I. Young Theeb (a name that means wolf) and his older brother Hussein are hired to guide an English soldier and his Arab companion Marji through the desert to a railway. The Englishmen’s orders are to get there fast, so they take a shortcut through the canyon, despite local warnings that the path has more bandits than pilgrims these days. The warnings prove prophetic, as they are waylaid at a well halfway through. Several bandits are killed and one badly injured before the soldier, Marji, and Hussein are all killed, leaving Theeb alone. After waiting at the well a couple days, the initially wounded bandit returns, having been abandoned by his thieving “friends.” Theeb is too small and not physically strong enough to get the bandit’s camel to follow orders, so he nurses the bandit well enough to take them out of there. This uneasy alliance is the focalpoint of the final third of the film. Fantastic, suspenseful film, and a bit of a coming-of-age in a world very different from the one we live here in the USA. The end will leave you thinking. ★★★½

monosMonos hails from Colombia, directed by Alejandro Landes. This is a powerful film about a group of teenagers, really not much more than boys and girls, who have been recruited into a guerrilla war. The commander looking over their regiment, a militant and abusive man known as “the messenger,” has charged them with watching over an American hostage whom they call the doctor. The kids all go by nicknames, or call-signs, themselves, including Dog, Rambo, Bigfoot, Wolf, Lady, Smurf, and others. They though are obviously “bad guys,” they really are just children playing at being grownups, and their play in the beginning of the film drives this home. However, as the film goes along, they become more violent, and the movie takes on an almost Lord of the Flies-esque feel, with one boy starting to call all the shots and punish those who go against him. The imagery and music in this film are incredible. It’s impossible to explain, but the jungle feels alive through the screen, and you feel like you are there with them. An incredibly touching and emotional film, with mostly an unknown cast, with only two recognizable faces if you watch a lot of films, and otherwise newcomers, all of whom are up to the task for the nuanced and difficult roles. ★★★★

mustangMustang is a powerful film, the debut of director Deniz Gamze Erguven, and a coproduction of France and Turkey. Drawing a lot of parallels to Sofia Coppola’s famous The Virgin Suicides, it is about five sisters growing up together in Turkey. Their parents are dead, and they’ve been raised by their grandmother and uncle. Seeing them as getting too wild in their strict conservative society, grandmother decides it is finally time to start marrying them off, though all are just teenagers, and still engage in childish games with each other. Worse yet, in their culture, they rarely get to pick the lucky husband. Not to mention, we see more is going on behind closed doors than we are aware of in the beginning, when we see that after the two oldest daughters are married out, the uncle secrets into the third daughter’s bedroom one night. Told from the perspective of the youngest sister, Lale, who sees and notices all, it is a compassionate film about the perseverance and bond of sisters’ love. Though the film received criticism in Turkey for not accurately depicting the culture towards women there, I’m sure there are still plenty of places in the world where they are treated as such, and it is an eye-opening film for the age we live in. ★★★★

first loveFirst Love is a Japanese film, highly entertaining, which almost defies characterization. It is billed as a crime thriller, but I think it had more laugh-out-loud moments that suspenseful ones, and the fight scenes have so much gratuitous gore that it is beyond ridiculous. Many times in the film, you can’t help but chuckle and shake your head at the purposeful outlandishness of it all. Leo is a boxer who is told he has a huge inoperable brain tumor, on the same day that he crosses paths with Monica, a prostitute and drug addict who has been set up to take the fall in an inside drug deal that is supposed to go bad. Chased by the “good” bad guys, the “bad” bad guys, a corrupt cop, and a vengeful girl bent on getting revenge for her killed boyfriend, Leo and Monica spend a night just trying to survive. Thankfully for them, the pursuers are as inept as they come. I’m unfamiliar with director Takashi Miike’s work, but if they are all like this, they are probably all a wild ride. ★★★½

Quick takes on 5 Bresson films

A couple years ago I watched Robert Bresson’s A Man Escaped, and absolutely loved it. Today’s a look at some of other stuff.

les dames du boisHell hath no fury like a woman scorned. That’s the gist of Les Dames du Bois de Boulogne (The Ladies of the Park). Helene is a rich single woman who’s been in an open relationship with Jean for two years, but she loves him enough to finally get married. Unfortunately he doesn’t feel the same way, so when he calls it off to be “just friends,” Helene sets out to get her cold-hearted revenge. She knows of a single mother who has fallen on hard times. The adult daughter, Agnes, once dreamed of being a ballerina, but has resorted to being a cabaret dancer and prostitute to support herself and her mom. Helene rescues the family from their debts and puts them in a new apartment, and slyly introduces them to Jean, knowing that Agnes’ good looks will entice him. Helene is right, and Jean falls head over heals. Agnes rightly guesses that Helene has an ulterior motive, but her mom refuses to listen, feeling indebted to Helene. Agnes resists for awhile, shameful of her past, and even tries to tell Jean, but he dismisses her protestations, going on Helene’s word that Agnes’s is a fine upstanding family which has just been going through a difficult situation. Agnes and Jean get married without him knowing of her past, and only then is it revealed to him, with Helene having invited many of her former lovers to the wedding. It’s a delightful perverse film, but also has a message of redemption, and not just for Agnes. ★★★★

diary of a country priestDiary of a Country Priest is a low-key film about a man who takes on his first parish in a rural community, and he’s probably unprepared for what he finds there. Our unnamed priest is a young man, just out of seminary, who is quiet and contemplative, pious yet unsure of himself. He is prone to arguing with his parishioners when they don’t see things the way he thinks they should, which doesn’t exactly make him any friends in the small community. To make matters worse, he is sickly for an unknown reason, able to only eat and drink break and diluted wine. The constant wine drinking spreads rumors that he is a drunk, and a lying young girl makes up more lies about him which makes matters worse. In the end, as his illness progresses, he finds solace not in any of his community, but in a fallen priest who attended school with him, who left the church and is now living unmarried with a woman. Though he struggles with his faith through most of the film, with his friend at his side, our priest seems to find himself at the end. I liked this film, and I think I would have really liked it more if I hadn’t been interrupted while watching it. I hate to start a movie if I don’t have time to get through it in one sitting, and unfortunately I was pulled away a few times, once for an extended time, and this is the kind of character film that you just can’t do that on. It pulls you in with all of the emotion of the priest, his fear of not living up to his calling. If I watch this one again, I’d make sure to do in one sitting, and would probably rate it higher. ★★★

pickpocketPickpocket is widely heralded, but I just didn’t get the hype. It is about a man, Michel, who is forced to turn to thievery to survive. Already living in a rundown building (he leaves his apartment door wide open when he isn’t home, the lock is broken), and trying also to support his ailing mother, Michel has been out of work for a long time. His first stealing attempt, at the racetrack, ends up with him getting caught, but the police are unable to prove he is the thief, and he is let go. He is caught again a short time later, but the victim simply demands his money back without calling the cops. After these early run-ins, Michel is able to latch on to a group of professional thieves who take him under their wing, teaching him techniques and honing his “craft.” In the meantime, Michel begins to fall for the young neighbor of his mom’s. Bresson was famous for wanting his actors to display as little emotion as possible, preferring to let the story speak for itself, but that becomes the detriment in a film like Pickpocket. Even as Michel narrates to the viewer that he is under extreme stress from fear of getting caught, we certainly can’t tell by watching his face. Call me old fashioned, but I like to immerse myself in the film and get to a place where I am swept up in events the characters are going through, and it’s hard to do that when they are all stone-faced all the time. ★★

trial of joan of arcUnfortunately I didn’t really enjoy The Trial of Joan of Arc either. Bresson did a lot of research to make this film, a portrayal of Joan’s trial and eventual death by being burned at the stake, but to get that true story across, the whole picture is just spoken dialogue. In fact, it could take place in one long scene had Bresson not attempted to break up the monotony of it by showing the priests walking around. And by walking around, I mean out of the “room,” since it is was obviously filmed on a shoestring budget on tiny lots. It happens so often, it almost became comical to see the judges ask Joan a few questions, then get up and walk out the back. And unfortunately Bresson’s reliance on nonprofessional actors really shows in all the dialogue. It literally looks like they are reciting lines, unemotionally and with little rehearsing. The final scene of Joan’s death is powerful, but you’d expect that for such a climactic and historical scene. The rest of the movie bored me to sleep. ★½

au hasard balthazarWe go from 2 movies with little emotion, to one that is full of it. Au Hasard Balthazar is a monumentous film; at its root, it is the life and death of Balthazar the donkey, but it is so much more. Balthazar is born into what appears to be a good life. He is loved as a young donkey by Marie, a little girl, and Marie’s playmate/early “boyfriend,” Jacques. However, when Jacques’s sister dies, the family moves away, and Marie isn’t so happy anymore, and Balthazar’s own life of joy ends, never to return. He spends the next 15 years floating from owner to owner, all within the same tiny town, and each seemingly more cruel than the previous one. None really care for Balthazar, other than his use as a pack animal, and he is beaten and mistreated continuously. Even an older Marie, who has fallen in with a bad crowd, shows mostly apathy towards Balthazar when she sees him. In the end, Balthazar dies alone, surrounded by sheep on a hillside. The obvious metaphor to Balthazar’s life is that of Jesus (Bresson was a Catholic and did not shy away from religious material in many of his films, as noted above). Balthazar is treated roughly during his time on this earth, used as a tool by the cruel and loved by few, yet he carries on as a noble animal without ever quitting. I think the selection of a donkey, besides its obvious biblical link, works perfectly: we associate it as a burden animal, and one that doesn’t fight back and which can’t escape its life. ★★★★

I read 100 books!

The title is obviously misleading, because of course I’ve read a lot more than 100 books. But what I did was read a list of the 100 “greatest” books of the 20th century. I started on it back in 2015, because I wanted to read a bunch of the so-called classics, many of which I feel get ignored these days (unless your high school teacher forces it on you), but also because I wanted to challenge myself to expand past my normal daily reading into genres and themes I wouldn’t normally pick up off the shelf.

It’s been a blast. It took a hair over 5 years total, though in my defense, a solid year (May 2017 – May 2018) I took as a break to read some other books. During that time, I read some current books that had stacked up on me, and also, having read a few books by Willa Cather on the list (which I loved), I read through her other books which were not on the list. I also took a small break to read Infinite Jest, because I’d recently seen a movie about the author, and was intrigued.

As expected, I didn’t enjoy everything. Some books took a really long time to read, and others were difficult for their own reasons. But what a joy to read some of the truly greatest authors of the last 100 years, writers you recognize from a single name alone: Lewis, Hemingway, Conrad, Fitzgerald, Joyce (Henry and James!), Wolfe (and Woolf!), Steinbeck, and so many more. Some of these books made me think, some made me cry. Reading through these (many of which were old) books also expanded my tastes in the films I watched. Whereas I used to stick to modern releases, as you can see from my blog, I got heavy into films of all genres, countries, and ages.

So what’s next? I don’t know! I love setting goals for myself, but right now I don’t have one. I saw 100 movies in the theater in 2014, read 100 books from then till now, and last year saw 365 films in a year. I can’t possibly go any bigger. There are still plenty of great books and movies out there left unknown to me, so I think I’m going to keep watching, keep reading, and please, if you see or read something good, recommend it to me. I might try to start writing longer (better) reviews for the newer films I watch, more like I used to a few years ago, but these days I watch so much that I’m not sure I can stick to it. We’ll see!

For posterity’s sake, here’s the final list (read in reverse order, started at # 100) :

Fitzgerald’s epic tale of loss in Gatsby

IMG_3343

Just a couple months past 5 years, I’ve completed my quest to read 100 great classics with one of the best, F Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby. It’s almost fitting that I finish with a Fitzgerald piece, as it nearly started with one too (# 96 was The Beautiful and the Damned, which I wrote about way back in March 2015).

Gatsby is arguably his most famous work, so you’ve probably read it yourself in school, or seen the movie with Leonardo DiCaprio, or at least know the gist of it. Told from the perspective of Jay Gatsby’s friend Nick Carraway, it is a tale of lost love, regret, and a man’s single minded obsession. By all appearances, Gatsby is fabulously wealthy, throwing large, extravagant parties at his sprawling estate to which anyone and everyone is invited, but his past is a complete mystery and the subject of wild speculation among society. Across the bay from him lives Tom and Daisy Buchanan, a rich couple with marital problems. Tom is a brute and cheats on his wife, but Daisy seems to turn a blind eye to his activities. Our narrator Nick is the link between these people: Daisy is his second cousin, he went to school with Tom, and he is Gatsby’s neighbor.

As Nick gets to know Gatsby, he learns Jay’s terrible secret: he is a former love of Daisy’s from before the war, purposefully bought the house across the bay from the Buchanan’s, and has been throwing these huge parties in hopes that she would come and see him. She’s never made the trip though, so finally Gatsby gets Nick to invite her to tea at Nick’s house, and Jay swoops in to see her. After an awkward moment, they seem to pick up where they left off 5 years previous, and Jay confides his ultimate plan to Nick. He wants Daisy to leave Tom, and not only that, but to confess to him that she’s always loved Gatsby and never loved Tom at all. Jay has built his fortune from the ground up (through illegal bootlegging, but that’s another story), and is used to getting his way, but obviously he can’t control people’s emotions, no matter how hard he tries. During the big final confrontation, Daisy refuses to admit what he wants in any kind of definitive way.

Daisy flees the scene with Gatsby in his very recognizable luxury car, and while speeding home, they strike and kill a pedestrian, who is Tom’s not-so-secret mistress, Myrtle, no less. Though Daisy was the driver, Jay is ready to take the blame. He waits outside the Buchanan house to see if Daisy will come to him, but she ends up making up with Tom and never leaves. The next day, Gatsby goes for a swim in his pool (he had been lamenting that everyone uses his pool except himself) and is shot and killed in a murder-suicide by Myrtle’s surviving husband, who of course thought that Gatsby was the driver the previous night. At Gatsby’s funeral, the only attendees are some of his servants, Nick, and Jay’s long-unknown father. Daisy and Tom had already skipped town and she wouldn’t even return Nick’s calls.

Fitzgerald’s writing is so easy to read, so lyrical, that it is easy to see why his books have stayed so popular. This is the fourth book of his I’ve read, and I’ve enjoyed them all. Gatsby is filled with such a feeling of loss, yet also I felt hope at times, that you can’t help but get swept up in the emotional roller coaster ride of it all. Knowing a little of Fitzgerald’s own conflicted love affair with his wife Zelda, it is easy to see the depth of the well he had to pull from.

Salinger’s Holden Caulfield speaks to a generation in Catcher

IMG_2807

The Catcher in the Rye is an incredible book, the epitome of why I wanted to embark on this quest to read all these classics that I hadn’t been through before. I’ve read others gush about this book, seen movies where people discuss it, but never read it myself. It lived up to the hype, and I can see why it influenced an entire generation of people who came of age in the 50’s and 60’s.

The book tells of just a couple days in the life of Holden Caulfield, and written from his perspective. Holden is a young man, but he has yet to find anything to which he wants to apply himself, and so by age 16, he’s already being kicked out of his third or fourth high school. Coming from an affluent family in New York, he knows he’s disappointing his parents, but he doesn’t seem to care too much. He spends his final day at school interacting with his roommates in his dorm and a former teacher, before grabbing a train for New York. There he continues floating through life. He gets a room at a hotel, has a hooker sent up to his room but can’t do anything with her (he laments that he’s a virgin, mostly through lack of effort than any other reason), spends a late night dancing with girls from out of town, has a date with an old fling, visits a few bars and Central Park, and even sneaks into his family home (a posh apartment in a high rise) to see his cherished younger sister. Holden decides that rather than face his parents, he’s going to hitchhike out west and get a job, although the reader gets the distinct impression that the reason behind this is more for lack of direction in his life than for any purpose to make himself self-sufficient.

There are a lot of other events in Holden’s spectacular couple days drifting through New York, but all of these events by themselves are not the true “story” of the book. The real meat and potatoes is the running dialogue in Holden’s head as he tells the tale of those days to us. At his core, Holden is going through the same things that many 16-year-olds go through. He’s lonely, feeling disconnected with his peers, and purposefully alienates himself from others, calling them phony or crumby. By doing so, he sets himself apart from others, though it isn’t clear if he truly thinks he is better than them, or just using this as a self defense mechanism. He’s definitely immature, but there’s no fault in that at age 16. He also have a very frank, yet very endearing way of talking to us, and I as the reader quickly felt like Holden’s only confident (outside of his sister Phoebe) in the whole world. It is easy to see why the book spoke to its readers, and I think if I had read it at a younger age, it may have had a lasting impression on me. As it is, it is a tremendous read and a fun one. I kept hoping Holden would come out well in the end; you just can’t help but root for him. Fittingly so though, the book’s ending is as uncertain as Holden’s life and future.

Quick takes on 5 films

mickey and the bearMickey and the Bear is, I think, falsely called a coming-of-age tale, because the girl in it was forced to grow up a long time ago. Mickey is on the cusp of graduating high school, and lives with her single father, a marine veteran who clearly suffers from PTSD. He uses oxy and alcohol to get through his day, and Mickey has been playing the roles of student, breadwinner, and caregiver for a long time. As she’s trying to navigate her own issues with a juvenile boyfriend, and tamp down dreams of leaving Montana for bigger and better places, she has to come to terms with the fact that her father may never be what she wants and needs. He’s a drunk and abusive, and he’s never going to get better. It might be an unpopular opinion, but I’m not a fan of making excuses for people, no matter what they may have gone through. Mickey’s dad’s bad life doesn’t give him a pass to be an asshole to his daughter. She loves and wants to help her dad, but he seems unwilling or incapable of helping himself, yet she continually sticks by his side. It’s a very good film. The dad is played by James Badge Dale, who you’d recognize for all his roles in military and action films, and Camila Morrone, who I’d not seen before, is fantastic as Mickey. This is the type of film that critics love, but it’s good for average moviegoers too. ★★★★

midwayMidway is one of those films where you better hope the action scenes make up for the rest of it, and for the most part, it is passable. Telling the historical lead-up and eventual battle of the one of the turning points in World War II in the fight for the Pacific, it features some amazing actions sequences, offset by some cringe-worthy dialogue and a serious case of over-acting by everyone on screen, even by well-known actors I like, which I can only attribute to bad directing. There’s a huge cast on both the American and Japanese side of the conflict. After a short prelude showing a meeting between the countries in 1937, the film fasts forward to the attack on Pearl Harbor, the USA’s response in the Doolittle Raid on Tokyo, and finally the epic battle around the tiny island of Midway. Director Roland Emmerich’s movies tend to make a lot of money, but these days his pieces are more about explosions than story, and he hasn’t made a really great picture in 20 years. Despite all that, the action moments, those referenced battle scenes, are so incredibly good, that they nearly make up for everything bad. I found myself cheering aloud when an enemy plane was shot down. Fans of the genre should find enough to like. ★★★

horse girlHorse Girl stars Alison Brie as Sarah, a shy and lonely young woman whose only real contact with the world is a kind coworker (Joan, played by Molly Shannon) and a roommate (Nikki, Debby Ryan). She regularly visits a horse she used to own, Willow, but its new owners don’t appreciate her coming around. She’s also haunted by the accident of her friend Heather, who suffered a brain injury after falling from a horse years earlier, and the recent death of her mother. Sarah begins suffering from nosebleeds, and at the same time, starts zoning out while awake, coming to in odd places and not remembering how she got there. As Sarah starts to give in to some crazy paranoid delusions about alien abductions and cloning, she really starts to spiral out of control. The film begins as sort of an off-beat, quirky drama, typical for what you’d expect from an indie flick, but as Sarah starts losing time, it takes an unexpected, dark turn, and takes the viewer with it. Towards the end, I had less of an idea of what was going on than Sarah. There are parts that are really good, and Brie tries her best to sell it, but man, what a weird film. ★★

imp jokersImpractical Jokers: the Movie is really just for die-hard fans of the long-running tv show, fans like me and my wife. We’ve been watching since shortly after it debuted and I don’t think we’ve ever missed an episode. Recent seasons seem to have lost the luster a bit, so I did have a little trepidation in going to see the four comedians ribbing each other on the big screen, but the film is whole lot of fun. Based around a very loose plot about the four men getting dissed by Paula Abdul in high school, and 20 years later making the cross-country drive to see her in Miami, the movie is mostly just more skits that you’d normally see on the show. But for the most part, they are really good skits. There are lots of subtle jokes and easter eggs for longtime fans, so I’m not sure that someone new to the Tenderloins will laugh as hard as I did, but I thought it was great. No spoilers here, but know that if you like the show, but didn’t know how it would translate to the big screen, my advice is to just go see it. ★★★★

knives outKnives Out is a terrific film from director Rian Johnson. Even if you weren’t a fan of The Last Jedi (I was!), you have to admit Brick and Looper were pretty amazing. He continues to make strides with Knives Out, a modern day murder-mystery. The film revolves around the wealthy Thrombey family, all of whom trace their money to patriarch Harlan (Christopher Plummer), an established writer. When Harlan is found dead one day though, of an apparent suicide, the family can’t wait to divy up his wealth. The kink in the works though is a private investigator, Benoit Blanc (Daniel Craig) thinks that, just perhaps, it was murder and not suicide. Each family member and caregiver is examined and interviewed, and all of the dirty laundry is aired. The cast is great, with members of the family including Chris Evans, Jamie Lee Curtis, Michael Shannon, Toni Collette, Don Johnson, Ana de Armas, and even Frank Oz showing up as a lawyer. Though the mystery isn’t as good as maybe it could have been, as I had it all figured well before the end, the reveal is no less fun for it. A tremendously exciting, well acted, and well told story. ★★★★½

Quick takes on 5 Altman films

Robert Altman was a celebrated director whose films weren’t always commercial successes, but many of which were critically acclaimed, and he’s often cited as inspiration to today’s directors and writers. Unfortunately I did not have much experience with his work, outside of his first big hit (MASH) and a show he did for HBO in the 80’s (Tanner ’88). It was high time I rectified that.

mccabe and mrs millerMcCabe & Mrs Miller is a revisionist western film released in 1971, with an all-star cast lead by two of the biggest stars at the time, Warren Beatty (coming off Bonnie and Clyde) and Julie Christie (recently from Doctor Zhivago). Altman called it an “anti-western.” The heroes (or anti-heroes, as the case may be) are likeable, but they certainly aren’t role models. John McCabe is a gambler, newly arrived in the tiny northwest town of Presbyterian Church. He sees potential in the little town with its nearby rich mine and large male population, and opens up a whorehouse. He’s just getting started when Constance Miller comes to town and wants to become his partner. She wants to take his trashy prostitutes and classy them up a bit, charging more money for a high-class establishment. As the town continues to grow, business is good, and the duo start making a ton of money. This catches the attention of some businessmen in a nearby city, who come to Presbyterian Church to make McCabe and offer he can’t refuse. Unfortunately for him, he does refuse it, leading to some good old fashioned gun fights. I didn’t know what to think about this film for the first half or so. It took awhile to get going and the narrative is hard to follow, but by the end, I was hooked. It is one of the most “real” westerns I can remember seeing in some time. Everything from the sounds of the town, to the unfinished sets in it (purposefully done so by Altman, to give the impression of a growing town), to the flaws of its citizens, to even the grainy subdued picture (again, on purpose) really places the viewer inside the action. Great film, with lots of recognizable faces in the cast (Shelley Duvall, the late, great Rene Auberjonois, etc). ★★★★

imagesAltman followed up with Images, and at first, I couldn’t decide if this film is really good or really bad. It is a psychological thriller starring Susannah York (who won a best actress at Cannes for the role in 1972). At first Cathryn is just hearing things: an unknown woman keeps calling to tell her her husband Hugh (Star Trek’s favorite future shapechanging Odo, Rene Auberjonois again) is cheating on her. It isn’t long before she starts seeing things too though. She keeps seeing visions of a dead former lover, and when a man she once had an affair with stops in to visit Cathryn and her husband at a weekend getaway, she starts seeing all three men interchangeably. Cathryn will be kissing a man she thinks is her husband, see in a flash that it is actually the family friend, and then think it is her dead former lover, all in the span of seconds. She also intermittently sees herself in out-of-body experiences, walking across the gardens from the window, or overlooking the house from nearby cliffs. Her deteriorating condition worsens as the film goes along. Altman puts amazing camerawork to use, swapping out actors in the same take to disturbing effect for the viewer. The beginning felt a little gimmicky, but after awhile, even the viewer starts to feel Cathryn’s insanity, like something is slipping. It really pulls you in. At the end of the day, it is a solid film worthy of a single viewing, though I’m not sure I’d watch it again. ★★★

nashvilleIn 1975, Altman had his biggest critical success since MASH, with his film Nashville, which still holds the record for most Golden Globe nominations at 11. The backstory of the film is about a politician (who is never shown on screen), running for President on an independent ticket, who is putting together music talent for a fundraiser and rally in Nashville. While that is the overarching idea, most of the film is light on actual plot, following the lives of a multitude of eclectic characters over the course of a few days. The first 20-ish minutes go by at a frantic pace. The large cast isn’t given given true introductions in the traditional movie sense, we just see them on camera doing their normal things, and not even one at a time. It goes by so fast that we don’t know who to focus on, and the various characters aren’t fleshed out until later. Characters are always talking over each other, with multiple on-camera conversations going on at the same time, something Altman would become famous for in his pictures. It works in real life, but does make it difficult to follow in a motion picture. The film ends up playing out as satire, portraying our culture as one obsessed more with the performer as a celebrity and less about the music they are creating. As I mentioned, it has a huge cast; I think I read somewhere it has 24 main characters. Many are future all-stars before they were big. The list includes Ned Beatty, Keith Carradine, Scott Glenn, Shelly Duvall, Jeff Goldblum, and Lily Tomlin (in her first role). While the movie is critically acclaimed, it was a it too aimless for me. There are some quirky, funny moments, and it features a fantastic soundtrack (Altman once noted there was an hour of music throughout the 2 ½ hour+ film), but I think this is one of those films that was much more important in its time, especially its political aspects, than what it is today. ★★½

3 womenIf you want to see a case study in strong women actors, look no further than Altman’s masterpiece 3 Women, released in 1977. The 2 obvious women are Millie and Pinky, introduced early in the film. Millie (Shelley Duvall) is an outgoing yet lonely woman, whose forceful personality turns just about everyone off. Yet she is an instant attraction for the shy and introverted Pinky (Sissy Spacek), who is new to the area. Whereas Millie keeps people away with her attitude, Pinky does so with her awkward and clumsy speech. Pinky does latch on to Millie though and it isn’t long before they are roommates, where they come into contact with the third woman, Willie (Janice Rule). Willie is an artist, painting murals around the area, and she doesn’t say much to anyone, even her husband, the womanizing Edgar. As these three females hang around each other, their personalities blur, until an amazing final scene which makes you want to stop and rewatch the whole thing again. Altman has stated that Bergman’s Persona was a big influence for this film, and having seen it recently, I can definitely see why. The film is engaging from the start, gripping throughout, and downright chilling at times too. Truly amazing acting from Duvall and Spacek, who were still relatively early in their careers. Duvall was still 3 years away from her biggest known role in The Shining, and Spacek was a year removed from Carrie. ★★★★★

playerGoing to skip ahead a few years, to arguably Altman’s next biggest hit, in 1992. The Player features a huge cast and an even larger list of A-list cameos of the era, a reported 65 people, many in short scenes just playing themselves around the Hollywood lots and restaurants. At the start, I thought maybe it was a comedy, because the opening scene shows Buck Henry pitching “The Graduate 2” to a film exec. While it continues to have hilarious moments throughout, the film gets dark too. The movie follows a Hollywood exec named Griffin Mill (Tim Robbins) who starts to receive anonymous death threats. Mill thinks he knows who’s been sending them, a disgruntled writer he rejected recently named David Kahane (a young Vincent D’Onofrio), and Mill goes to meet him to try to make amends. At the same time, Mill feels threatened from a new hotshot executive at the studio, Larry Levy (Peter Gallagher), who seems to have risen through the ranks quickly by rubbing the right elbows. The rest of the film plays out in thrilling fashion, much like one of the classic Hollywood pieces discussed on screen. Murder, sex, a police investigation, a run from the cops, and the supreme ego of the film execs all come together for as complete a film as you will find. It’s also a movie-lovers wet dream, full of visual and spoken references (some subtle, some not so much) to the history of film. I loved every minute of it. ★★★★★

Quick takes on 5 films

doctor sleepI’m a big fan of The Shining (the film, and admittedly maybe because I’m a huge Kubrick fan), but ashamedly I’ve never read the book, much to my son’s consternation (one of his favorite books, and he dogs me about it because he hates the film). I’ve been excited to see Doctor Sleep, the sequel to that long-ago book and film. Danny Torrance (portrayed wonderfully by Ewan McGregor) is all grown up. He’s kept his “shine” skill locked up inside himself all these years, which probably, unknowingly, saved his life. There’s a group of evil beings that have been hunting people with the shine for hundreds of years, feeding on them to extend their own lives. While feeding on one such young boy in Iowa, the violence grabs the attention of a teenage girl, Abra, living in New Hampshire. Abra is very powerful in the shine, and while she is feeling the death of the boy, her power is felt by the evil cult. Knowing they will come for her, Abra reaches out to Danny for help. This film is tremendous. Not overly scary but definitely creepy, it is more of a thriller in the vein of Carrie or some of those kinds of Stephen King’s stories. I’m not a big fan of the very ending of the film, the last 15-20 minutes of this 2 ½ hour picture, but the rest of the film is so great, I still highly recommend it. As a huge fan of King’s Dark Tower series, I also appreciated the whole lot of references to other works of King throughout the film, including the Dark Tower. ★★★★

honey boyI wanted to watch Honey Boy because of its sterling reviews, but had a certain, subdued expectation going in as well. The film is a fictionalized biography written by Shia LaBeouf, about his childhood with her abusive father. It is based on a screenplay LaBeouf wrote while in rehab, as a form of therapy. LaBeouf is a fantastic actor, but let’s be honest, he can be a piece of shit sometimes. I expected this film to be a pat-on-the-back, “this is why I’m effed up” excuse for his behaviors. It isn’t. The film is a frank, open, honest, and vulnerable depiction of LaBeouf’s complicated relationship with his father. LaBeouf plays his own dad, with Lucas Hodges and Noah Jupe playing a fictionalized version of himself named Otis. Otis is a 12-year-old child actor living with his dad in a longterm motel. Dad is a former rodeo clown, a Vietnam vet, and an alcoholic, who, as a convicted felon, can’t hold a job. He’s awful to Otis, but it is obvious that his behavior masks his contempt for himself and the way his life has turned out, the failure as a man and father that he sees in himself. LaBeouf’s screenplay and the direction by Alma Har’el are perfect. This is a hard film to do well. Make it too sappy, and it would come off as contrived or preachy. Make it too documentorial, and it would be what I first expected, an excuse for LaBeouf’s problems. Instead, it really is perfect as it sits. The three main actors are all great (close your eyes, and Hodges sounds just like LaBeouf). ★★★½

ford v ferrariFord v Ferrari details the historical period when Henry Ford’s car company’s sales were down, losing business to rival Chevy and prestige to European speedsters like Ferrari. Up-and-comer Lee Iacocca convinces Henry Ford II to go after the latter to beat the former. Lee promotes getting more heavily involved in the racing format, with the goal to win the Le Mans 24 hour race, to show the world that Ford can build cars that can compete with anyone. To meet this end, they reach out to Caroll Shelby to help design Ford’s newest racing machine, and Shelby then approaches longtime friend and fellow racer, Ken Miles, to drive it. The film showcases these people’s attempt to beat Ferrari and his racing car, both through innovation in the garage and by getting the best driver on the course. The film does an excellent job of balancing the heart-pounding action of the races with the drama (and personality clashes) behind the scenes. Though a film like this doesn’t always rely heavily on acting chops, everyone turns in a good performance, from Matt Damon as Shelby to Christian Bale as Miles, and supported by Josh Lucas, Jon Bernthal, and a host of others. Very good film. As a racing picture, I think I dug Rush from a few years ago a bit more, but this film feels more balanced. ★★★½

peanut butter falconIf you are looking for a feel-good picture, it doesn’t get any better than The Peanut Butter Falcon. It takes a classic innocent boy running away to fulfill a dream kind of story, and swaps the young boy with a man with down syndrome instead. You don’t see many films with such a person in the main, leading role, and newcomer Zack Gottsagen is up to the task. In the film, Zack is a young man forced to live at a retirement community, because he has no family to do the things he cannot do for himself. However, he feels trapped, and while he has friends there, he’s also about 50 years younger than everyone else. Eleanor (Dakota Johnson) is a kind nurse/caregiver, but she doesn’t fully understand Zack’s predicament. One night, Zack successfully breaks out, and finds himself the unlikely companion of a local roughneck, Tyler (Shia LeBeouf again!). Tyler is on the run himself, and decides to lead Zack to a wrestling school a few miles away, where Zack hopes to meet his personal hero, a wrestler named The Salt Water Redneck. With Eleanor on their tail, as well as a couple hoodlums chasing Tyler, a bond forms between our duo on their multiple adventures. It’s heartwarming, thoughtful, eye-opening, and above all else, beautiful. ★★★★

ad astraCan a man learn from his mistakes, and the mistakes of his father? That’s the big question in James Gray’s Ad Astra, a deep and contemplative film, as was Gray’s last one, The Lost City of Z. Instead of the jungles of the Amazon, this time Gray takes us to the emptiness of space. Set in the “near future,” Roy McBride (Brad Pitt) is a cool, calm, and collected astronaut, who doesn’t get rattled even under extreme pressure. When sudden and deadly energy surges start hitting Earth, McBride is sent to Mars for a top secret mission. The brass have discovered the surges are coming all the way from Neptune, and the last thing that far out in our solar system was a mission by McBride’s long-last and presumed dead father, hero astronaut Clifford McBride. The elder McBride took a team to Neptune years earlier, to build a remote station in hopes of contacting life further out in space. He never contacted his family again, leading Roy to grow up with some serious relationship issues. On Mars, Roy receives the news that his father may have survived all these years out by Neptune, which brings back a lot of memories and feelings Roy thought to have buried long ago. Both introspective and gripping, with moments of sheer intensity that will get your heart rate going even in McBride’s isn’t, I absolutely loved this film. It is downright scary at times too, when Roy is out in space with no one to help when something goes wrong. Some may find the pacing a bit slow, but if you are a fan of Kubrick’s 2001, you’ll probably like this one too. ★★★★½

Misery abounds in Steinbeck’s epic Wrath

IMG_2806

During the journey through these 100 books, I’ve read a lot I’d never been through before. I did however, once upon a time way back in high school, read John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath. It was so long ago that I only really remembered that it was a tragedy of epic proportions, and that nothing good happened to the family it centered on. Reading it now over 20 years later, it was fresh for me, but reaffirmed those memories.

The book focuses on the Joad family out of Oklahoma. The family consists of Ma and Pa, Pa’s brother Uncle John, the Joad adult children Al, Tom, Noah, and Rose, and the smaller children Ruthie and Winfield. Rounding out the clan is Pa’s parents, Granma and Grampa, Rose’s husband Connie, and family friend (and former preacher) Casy. The family has lost their farm due to years of declining crops as a result of the dust bowl, and are now being kicked off the land. Latching on to handbills that have been circulating promising work in California, they use a bit of saved money to buy an old jalopy of a truck, pour all their worldly possessions on it, and start the cross country drive, with less than $200 to their name.

Of course, everyone in the book has their issues, which I won’t get into here, but suffice to say, each member of the family has something they are dealing with, which they will each have to face (or choose to ignore) before the end. But don’t expect any good, happy endings here. Steinbeck wrote the novel to shine a light on the calamities faced by a good portion of our country during the great depression. The only good you see is the goodness that exists between people facing hardship together, both within the family, and from others facing the same problems. Even when they having nothing, they share what they can with others in need. But the hardships do pile up for the Joads.

On the journey west, Grampa (on the first day) and Granma (later on) both die. Noah gets fed up with the problems they are facing together and heads out on his own, with nary a goodbye to his family. Connie abandons his pregnant wife, Ruth, shortly after arriving in California. Once the Joads are there, they find, of course, life isn’t any better than what they left. The fliers promising work brought hundreds of thousands of people in situations like theirs, which has allowed the farmowners in California, mostly large corporations, to drive down workers’ pay to as little as a dollar a day in some places. People fight for even those jobs, because the only other option is watching your family starve. Most cannot find work at all.

The Joads do find a bit of luck at first, and are able to stay at a government assistance camp on their second day in California. It has running warm water, toilets, and a nice communal environment where people look out for each. But there is no work close, so 6 weeks in, they are completely broke. They use their last dollar to put some gas back in the truck, and leave to find work, and what little luck they found runs out. Casy is killed in an altercation with some local militia/hoodlums, and Tom kills the attacker, forcing Tom to go into hiding, later leaving the family to keep them safe. A huge rainstorm floods the area the family has been staying, destroying the truck and all their goods. Al leaves to marry his own girl, and Rose gives birth to a dead baby, probably from lack of proper nutrition. With nothing but the clothes on their back, Ma, Pa, Rose, Uncle John, and the little kids walk up the road and take shelter from the continuing rain in a barn. In these final pages, the most iconic image of the book takes place. They find a young man and his ill father, dying of starvation. Ma and Ruth share a knowing look, and Ma ushers everyone out while Ruth offers her milk to the man.

What can I say, it’s Steinbeck, so of course the novel is extremely well written. You get into the heads of everyone, and though the book mostly follows Tom, we see what makes each of them tick. Maybe my only gripe is Steinbeck doesn’t leave much to interpretation, he lays it all out and in some spots, drives home his point by reiterating ideas repeatedly. It’s probably what makes this point so popular in the school setting; it’s a well written book but doesn’t require deep introspective deciphering. Still, if that’s my only gripe, it’s a small one. I really enjoyed the book (again), and its eye-opening look at one of the terrible periods in our country’s history.